Elissa Slotkin

Legal challenges continue over a proposed federal mail-in voting rule stemming from President Donald Trump's March 31 executive order, which aims to restrict mail-in ballots to individuals verified as citizens. Two federal judges have blocked the order, while voting rights groups and Democrats argue it risks disenfranchising voters and violates election laws. The U.S. Postal Service is appealing the court decisions.

Legal challenges continue over a federal mail-in voting rule proposed under President Donald Trump's March 31 executive order, which aims to create a citizenship verification list for elections. Two federal judges have blocked the order, while voting rights groups and Connecticut's attorney general argue it risks disenfranchising voters and violates election administration principles.

A legal battle over a federal mail-in voting rule proposed under President Donald Trump's executive order continues, with opponents arguing it risks disenfranchising voters and violating election laws. Two federal judges have blocked the rule, while the U.S. Postal Service and voting rights groups challenge its implementation. The administration claims the measure aims to verify voter eligibility, but critics call it unconstitutional.

Lawmakers will vote on the Connected Vehicle Security Act, which aims to prohibit the import, sale, and operation of Chinese-made vehicles in the U.S. The bill was introduced by Sens. Bernie Moreno and Elissa Slotkin.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin and six Democratic senators wrote to Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth demanding explanations for blocking eight Navy officers from promotions, citing concerns about political motivations and demographic impacts. The blocked officers included women and Black individuals, and Hegseth allegedly prioritized someone from his inner circle. The letter requested documentation on the criteria and legal basis for the decisions.

The article discusses the growing influence of former CIA officers in Democratic politics, highlighting Elissa Slotkin and Abigail Spanberger's political advancements and criticizing their actions, such as Spanberger vetoing Democratic legislative priorities. It argues that CIA operatives in elected office pose risks to democracy and human rights due to their training in deception.

Mallory McMorrow suspended her Michigan U.S. Senate campaign, shifting the Democratic primary race between Haley Stevens and Abdul El-Sayed. The Senate seat is critical for Democrats to retain majority hopes, with the primary winner facing Republican Mike Rogers.

Democratic Socialists of America achieved primary wins in New York, defeating representatives Adriano Espaillat and Dan Goldman. Moderate Democrats and Republicans criticized the leftward shift, warning it could harm the party's broader appeal and electoral prospects.

Democratic Socialists of America achieved primary victories in New York, defeating Reps. Adriano Espaillat and Dan Goldman. Republicans and moderate Democrats criticized the wins as evidence of radicalization, while progressive leaders like Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez called for Democratic Party transformation. The outcomes have intensified internal Democratic Party divisions and provided Republicans with a political narrative for the midterms.

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) expressed support for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries in response to Sen. Elissa Slotkin's call for 'new leadership' among Democrats. The CBC emphasized unity behind Jeffries and a focus on lowering costs for working families.

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) expressed support for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries in response to Sen. Elissa Slotkin's call for 'new leadership' among Democrats. The CBC stated it remains united behind Jeffries and focused on policies aimed at lowering costs for working families.

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) expressed support for House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries following Sen. Elissa Slotkin's call for 'new leadership' in the Democratic Party. The CBC stated it remains focused on lowering costs for working families and defending priorities.

The Congressional Black Caucus (CBC) supports House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and criticizes Sen. Elissa Slotkin for advocating new leadership in Congress. The CBC accuses Slotkin of seeking higher office in 2028 and highlights her votes to confirm multiple members of President Donald Trump's Cabinet.

Trump responds to an Iranian drone strike on a ship by asserting American strength. A governor bans July Fourth fireworks statewide, and Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin criticizes her party. Other headlines include political tensions over socialist primary wins, a WNBA suspension, and Supreme Court rulings.

Senator Elissa Slotkin argues the Democratic Party requires new leadership after 2024 election losses, emphasizing the need to focus on key issues like the economy and education. She contrasts this with Donald Trump's simple message and highlights recent victories by progressive candidates in New York primaries.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin argues the Democratic Party requires new leadership following the 2024 election losses, stating old models are ineffective. She criticizes the party for having too many priorities and suggests focusing on key issues like affordability and education, citing Donald Trump’s success with a simple message. Slotkin also notes recent victories by Democratic socialists in New York primaries.

The U.S. Postal Service will halt mail ballot delivery in states that refuse to provide voter lists under a new rule, as per Postmaster General David Steiner's statement. The policy follows President Donald Trump's executive order and could limit mail voting to Republican-led states if Democratic-led states refuse to comply, with Democrats warning it may disenfranchise voters.

The U.S. Postal Service will halt mail ballot deliveries in states that refuse to submit lists of voters under a proposed rule, according to Postmaster General David Steiner. The rule, tied to an executive order by President Donald Trump, has drawn criticism from Democrats who argue it could disenfranchise voters and disproportionately affect states conducting elections via mail.

The U.S. Postal Service will halt mail ballot delivery in states refusing to submit lists of voters under a proposed rule, per Postmaster General David Steiner. This policy, following an executive order by President Donald Trump, could limit mail voting to Republican-led states during November midterms. The rule has drawn criticism from Democrats, who argue it may disenfranchise voters.

The U.S. Postal Service will halt mail ballot delivery in states that refuse to submit lists of voters under a proposed rule, per Postmaster General David Steiner. The policy, linked to President Donald Trump's executive order on mail voting, could limit mail voting in November midterms if Democratic-led states reject compliance.

The U.S. Postal Service threatens to halt mail ballot delivery in states refusing to submit absentee voter lists under a proposed rule, following an executive order by President Donald Trump. The rule could limit mail voting to Republican-led states during the November midterms if Democratic-led states refuse compliance, sparking accusations of election interference.

The U.S. Postal Service announced it will not deliver mail ballots in states that refuse to submit lists of voters under a proposed rule. Postmaster General David Steiner defended the rule during a Senate hearing, stating compliance is required for ballot delivery. Critics argue the policy risks disenfranchising voters.

The U.S. Postal Service will halt mail ballot delivery in states that refuse to submit voter lists under a proposed rule, per Postmaster General David Steiner. Democrats argue this could disenfranchise voters and is politically motivated, linked to President Donald Trump's executive order on mail voting.

Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to require congressional approval for deploying federal troops to polling places, responding to concerns raised by President Trump's openness to the idea. The legislation aims to block such deployments by requiring a congressional resolution and prohibiting military access to election records, while the White House countered by referencing stalled voting restrictions in the SAVE America Act.

Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to require Congressional approval for deploying federal troops to polling places, addressing concerns that President Trump might invoke a legal exception to bypass existing bans. The bill mandates 48-hour notice to Congress with justifications and prohibits military access to election records, while the White House countered by referencing stalled election security legislation.

Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act, requiring Congress to approve any deployment of federal troops to polling places. The bill aims to prevent President Donald Trump from invoking a legal exception to bypass restrictions on troops at polls, as concerns grow over potential deployments during the midterm elections. The White House responded by promoting its own legislation, the SAVE America Act, which has stalled in the Senate.

U.S. Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to require congressional approval for deploying federal troops to polling places, in response to concerns that President Donald Trump might use an exception in federal law to bypass the ban. The bill mandates a 48-hour notice to Congress and prohibits military personnel from accessing election records using federal funds.

U.S. Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to require Congressional approval for deploying federal troops to polling places, citing concerns that President Donald Trump might invoke a legal exception to bypass existing bans. The bill mandates 48-hour notice to Congress and prohibits military personnel from accessing election records using federal funds.

U.S. Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to require Congressional approval for deploying federal troops to polling places. The legislation aims to prevent President Donald Trump from invoking a legal exception to bypass the ban on military presence at elections, with provisions requiring 48-hour notice and prohibiting military access to election records. The White House responded by highlighting its own stalled legislation, the SAVE America Act.

U.S. Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to require Congressional approval for deploying federal troops to polling places, citing concerns over President Trump's public consideration of such actions. The bill mandates 48-hour advance notice to Congress with justifications and prohibits military access to election records.

Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act, requiring Congress to approve any deployment of federal troops to polling places. The legislation aims to prevent potential misuse of a legal exception allowing troops to 'repel armed enemies,' which some fear could be invoked by President Donald Trump. The bill mandates 48-hour notice to Congress and prohibits military access to election records.

U.S. Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to require Congressional approval for federal troop deployments at polling places, citing concerns over President Donald Trump's public contemplation of such actions. The legislation aims to block troops from accessing election records and mandates the White House provide justifications for any deployment.

Senate Democrats introduced the Protect Our Polls Act, requiring Congressional approval for federal troop deployment to polling places in response to President Donald Trump's refusal to rule out sending troops. The bill mandates 48-hour notice, legal justifications, and prohibits military access to election records. The White House countered with the stalled SAVE America Act, which would require voters to provide citizenship proof.

Sen. Elissa Slotkin introduced the Protect Our Polls Act to prevent deployment of troops and federal agents to polling sites. The bill aims to block President Trump from sending National Guard or ICE personnel to polling places ahead of midterm elections.

Democrats are shifting their foreign policy approach post-Trump and post-Biden, emphasizing a break from past interventions while avoiding a return to pre-2016 norms. Candidates like Matt Maasdam and Sen. Chris Murphy highlight war-weary stances and criticize Biden's handling of global conflicts.

Senate Democrats are urging the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to regulate prediction markets like Kalshi and Polymarket more strictly to address concerns over insider trading and consumer protection. The group of 16 senators, led by Amy Klobuchar, called for guidance to prevent event contract manipulation and ensure clear contract terms.

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney announced that the new Gordie Howe International Bridge across the Detroit River, which U.S. President Donald Trump had threatened to block, will open at the end of the week. The Canadian-funded bridge, a 50/50 ownership project with Michigan, is set to ease cross-border trade congestion between Canada and the United States.

Jewish Democrats express concerns about antisemitism and alienation within their party due to escalating tensions over Israel's actions in Gaza, warning it could impact the 2028 election in swing states with large Jewish populations. Specific incidents involving candidates and lawmakers have heightened alarm, with some Jewish Democrats considering leaving the party if the nominee is perceived as hostile to Israel.

Democratic Senators Mark Kelly, Adam Schiff, and Elissa Slotkin introduced the Drain the Slush Fund Act to block the Trump administration’s 'anti-weaponization' fund. The Department of Justice had earlier scrapped the fund, and the bill aims to prevent taxpayer money from being used for payments to President Trump.

Senate Democrats are opposing the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' through legislative strategies and a new bill. A federal judge has temporarily blocked the Justice Department from proceeding with the fund, which aims to provide taxpayer-funded payouts to individuals claiming the legal system was weaponized against them. The fund is part of a lawsuit settlement between President Trump and the federal government over his tax return leak.