Skip to content
The Nexus
DossierENTITY

Global Entry

Coverage of Global Entry in the Nexus archive.

Earliest in view: Jul 24 · 21:57 UTCMost recent: Jul 27 · 13:04 UTC
Co-mentioned in this coverage
Recent coverage
  • POLITICSJul 27 · 13:04 UTCOHIO CAPITAL JOURNAL
    Suit alleges Homeland Security targeted people observing, protesting immigration agents

    Three individuals sued the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for allegedly illegally recording them and revoking their status in trusted traveler programs while they observed or protested immigration enforcement activities. The lawsuit claims DHS violated privacy laws, administrative procedures, and the First Amendment by using facial recognition and other technologies to target protesters, including incidents in Minneapolis where two observers were killed.

  • POLITICSJul 26 · 22:49 UTCWISCONSIN EXAMINER
    Suit alleges Homeland Security targeted people observing, protesting immigration agents

    A federal lawsuit alleges the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally recorded and retaliated against individuals who observed or protested immigration enforcement actions, including revoking their status in trusted traveler programs like TSA Precheck and Global Entry. The suit claims DHS used facial recognition and license plate readers to target protesters, violating privacy laws, administrative procedures, and the First Amendment. The Electronic Privacy Information Center and three plaintiffs, including Minnesota resident Nicole Cleland, are part of the case.

  • POLITICSJul 26 · 16:59 UTCFLORIDA PHOENIX
    Suit alleges Homeland Security targeted people observing, protesting immigration agents

    A lawsuit alleges the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally recorded protesters and observers of immigration enforcement actions during the Trump administration, violating privacy laws, administrative procedures, and the First Amendment. The suit claims DHS used facial recognition and license plate readers to intimidate individuals, including incidents in Minneapolis where two people were killed, and revoked trusted traveler program statuses as retaliation.

  • POLITICSJul 25 · 14:01 UTCLOUISIANA ILLUMINATOR
    Suit alleges Homeland Security targeted people observing, protesting immigration agents

    A federal lawsuit alleges that the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally recorded protesters and observers of immigration enforcement, revoked their trusted traveler program status, and used facial recognition technology to retaliate against them. The suit claims DHS violated privacy laws, administrative procedures, and First Amendment rights, citing incidents in Minneapolis in January where two observers were killed during encounters with immigration agents.

  • POLITICSJul 25 · 10:01 UTCMICHIGAN ADVANCE
    Suit alleges Homeland Security targeted people observing, protesting immigration agents

    A federal lawsuit alleges the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) illegally recorded individuals observing and protesting immigration enforcement, including during a deadly January operation in Minneapolis. The suit claims DHS violated privacy laws, administrative procedures, and the First Amendment by using facial recognition and license plate readers to track protesters and revoking their participation in trusted traveler programs like TSA Precheck and Global Entry.

  • SECURITYJul 24 · 21:57 UTCLA TIMES CALIFORNIA
    DHS surveilled peaceful protesters and then yanked their Global Entry, federal lawsuit alleges

    A federal lawsuit filed in California alleges that the Department of Homeland Security surveilled peaceful protesters and revoked their Global Entry privileges as retaliation for exercising their constitutional rights.

  • SECURITYJul 24 · 21:57 UTCLA TIMES — LOCAL
    DHS surveilled peaceful protesters and then yanked their Global Entry, federal lawsuit alleges

    A federal lawsuit filed in California alleges that the Department of Homeland Security revoked plaintiffs' Global Entry privileges in retaliation for their exercise of constitutional rights. The lawsuit claims surveillance of peaceful protesters preceded the revocation.