Supreme Court
Tracked across 2,236 articles in the Nexus archive. Showing the most recent 40.
- FCC ruling puts onus of illegal construction on Sindh govt
The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) ruled that the Supreme Court overstepped its jurisdiction by ordering citywide demolitions of illegal constructions in Karachi. The FCC decision shifts responsibility to the Sindh government and Sindh Building Control Authority (SBCA) to regulate and preserve public amenities under existing laws.
- Trans advocates refocusing efforts after court defeats
The Supreme Court upheld state bans on transgender athletes in girls' and women's sports, marking a defeat for LGBTQ rights advocates. Trans advocates are refocusing their efforts as new legal challenges emerge, according to a report by Liz Landers.
- Trump administration rolls back a key protection for imperiled wildlife
The Trump administration finalized a rule altering the Endangered Species Act's enforcement, narrowing the definition of 'harm' to allow activities like oil drilling and logging in critical wildlife habitats without directly killing animals. Environmentalists criticized the change as risking extinction for some species, while industry representatives supported it as reducing regulatory burdens.
- Trump administration rolls back a key protection for imperiled wildlife
The Trump administration finalized a rule changing the Endangered Species Act's enforcement by narrowing the definition of 'harm,' allowing activities like oil drilling and logging in critical wildlife habitats as long as animals are not directly killed. Environmentalists warn this could accelerate species extinction, while industry and Republican allies argue it promotes economic growth by reducing regulatory burdens.
- What's next in the battle to 'save women's sports' after SCOTUS ruling — and the hidden damage driving it
The Supreme Court's ruling on trans athletes has not changed the reality for many women and girls in 23 states without laws restricting biological males from women's sports, including Washington. Athletes like Soleil Hoefer describe competitive disadvantages and a recent case where a Washington wrestler, Kallie Keeler, was allegedly sexually assaulted by a biological male trans competitor, highlighting broader safety concerns. Advocacy groups argue the issue extends beyond competition to safety in sports and facilities.
- Nursing home group asks for exemptions for Haitians working in Florida facilities
The Florida Health Care Association (FHCA) has requested exemptions for Haitian healthcare workers with temporary protected status (TPS) amid a Supreme Court ruling that ended deportation protections and work permits for Haitians and Syrians. The decision could impact up to 35,000 healthcare workers in Florida, straining nursing home staffing and resident care.
- Work permits expiring for thousands of immigrants in the US
The Supreme Court ruled that the Trump administration can cancel the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for immigrants from countries like Haiti and Syria, causing work permits for thousands to expire on July 10. Ohio Governor Mike DeWine and local leaders expressed concern over the impact on communities, while Haitian TPS holders and advocacy groups highlighted fears of deportation and economic hardship.
- Trump guts election commission in move seen as increasing his sway over midterms
President Donald Trump dismissed two members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, leading to its dissolution, a move seen as part of broader efforts to influence election procedures. The commission, established in 2002 to support state election systems, now has no members, with remaining Republican members resigning or leaving. Democrats and voting rights advocates criticize the action as an attempt to politicize elections ahead of midterms.
- Trump guts election commission in move seen as increasing his sway over midterms
President Donald Trump dismissed two members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, leading to its dissolution ahead of the midterms. Activists view this as part of Trump's efforts to influence election procedures, including promoting voter ID requirements and restricting mail-in voting.
- Trump guts election commission in move seen as increasing his sway over midterms
President Donald Trump dismissed members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), leaving it without any members. The move is seen as an effort to influence election procedures and increase political sway over midterms, part of broader actions including executive orders on voter citizenship proof and mail-in voting restrictions.
- Trump guts election commission in move seen as increasing his sway over midterms
President Trump dismissed two members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC), leaving it without any members. Critics argue this action aims to politicize elections and influence the 2022 midterms, with the White House denying such intentions and emphasizing a commitment to fair elections.
- Supreme Court pulls up Maharashtra govt. over ‘disturbing’ delays in criminal trials
The Supreme Court has reprimanded the Maharashtra government for 'disturbing' delays in criminal trials. The court ordered the government to submit an affidavit detailing reasons for prolonged trial pendencies and whether it has a policy to prevent accused persons from remaining in custody due to institutional limitations.
- License plate cameras may be next target after Supreme Court reins in location tracking
The Supreme Court's decision to limit location tracking may require warrants for license plate camera (ALPR) searches, potentially restricting their use and transforming modern policing practices.
- Supreme Court closes IPS officer’s plea on postpartum training policy
The Supreme Court dismissed an IPS officer's plea regarding a postpartum training policy, stating her case in the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) would proceed without being affected by a prior Delhi High Court order.
- Trump purges Election Assistance Commission members, months before midterms
President Trump removed members of the Election Assistance Commission, citing a Supreme Court ruling that allowed him to fire FTC Commissioner Louise Slaughter as legal precedent. The White House linked the removals to the ruling, with the action occurring months before midterm elections.
- Former FERC officials weigh in on Supreme Court ruling expanding president’s power to fire regulators
The Supreme Court ruled to expand the president's authority to remove regulators. Former FERC Chair Jon Wellinghoff warned that this could leave consumers vulnerable without regulatory protections.
- High court mysteries
The Supreme Court's visibility through books and public statements contrasts with its opaque practices. Major decisions often emerge at the term's end, possibly due to complexity or tradition, while 'relisted' cases are reconsidered repeatedly, tracked by Relist Watch. The court's customs, like Justice Brennan's ferry schedule influencing term dates, remain enigmatic.
- “Lost to History”: Uses and Abuses of the Past in Slaughter and Cook
The Supreme Court, in Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook, expanded presidential authority to remove federal agency officials, overturning a 1935 precedent. Chief Justice John Roberts cited the 1926 Myers v. United States case, which involved President Woodrow Wilson's controversial removal of a postmaster, as a foundation for the new ruling. Critics argue the Court ignored conflicting historical evidence, particularly suggesting Wilson's wife may have influenced the Myers decision.
- Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots ensures astronauts can vote from space — or anywhere else
A Supreme Court ruling on mail-in ballots allows astronauts to vote from space or any location. The decision expands voting accessibility for individuals in unique circumstances.
- Socialists launch radical platform to abolish the US Senate in bid to fundamentally transform America
The Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) plan to introduce a new platform aiming to abolish the US Senate, replace the president and Supreme Court with Congress-appointed bodies, provide amnesty for all immigrants, and defund the Department of War. The DSA has recently seen electoral successes, with several endorsed candidates defeating sitting Democratic members of Congress.
- ‘We're fighting this by ourselves’: Southern Black leaders feel abandoned by Democratic Party
Southern Black leaders express feelings of abandonment by the Democratic Party amid the Supreme Court's decision weakening the Voting Rights Act and Republican plans to redraw district lines. They highlight neglect from Democratic candidates, congressional leadership, and underfunding, while criticizing the party's failure to pass voting rights legislation.
- Brazil Debates Its Next Pension Reform as the Last One Unravels
Brazil's pension spending reached a record R$1.03trn in 2025, with the treasury paying R$320.9bn to close funding gaps. The Supreme Court recently struck down part of the previous pension reform, complicating efforts to address fiscal challenges.
- GBA seeks Supreme Court nod to postpone Bengaluru civic polls to December, cites Karnataka SIR
The Greater Bengaluru Authority (GBA) has filed an application with the Supreme Court to postpone Bengaluru's civic polls to December, citing the ongoing Karnataka State of the City Report (SIR) exercise. The application, submitted on July 9, claims that the administrative resources of the five city corporations are fully occupied with the SIR process.
- SIT moves Supreme Court to question officer in Gade Sai Krishna custodial death case
SIT has moved the Supreme Court to question an officer in the Gade Sai Krishna custodial death case. A suspended CI was booked under the SC and ST Act for alleged abetment to suicide of Perupogu Kranthi Kumar.
- Trump terminates remaining members of Election Assistance Commission after landmark Supreme Court ruling expanded his powers
Trump terminates remaining members of the Election Assistance Commission following a Supreme Court ruling that expanded his powers. The bipartisan EAC now has no commissioners and an uncertain future, with it unclear if Trump will appoint new members.
- FCC recalls orders that led to Nasla Tower demolition
The Federal Constitutional Court (FCC) recalled Supreme Court orders from 2018 and 2019 that authorized the Sindh government to demolish illegal buildings in Karachi, including the Nasla Tower. The FCC ruled that enforcing building laws is the provincial government's responsibility, not the judiciary, and criticized the Supreme Court for overstepping its role in directing citywide demolitions.
- Lahore High Court rules CNIC cannot be blocked to enforce maintenance decree
The Lahore High Court ruled that blocking a citizen's CNIC to enforce a maintenance decree violates due process and lacks legal sanction. The court overturned a 2017 order directing Nadra to block Nasir Ali Ranjha's CNIC for non-payment of maintenance, citing that CNICs are indispensable for fundamental rights and daily life.
- Federal appeals court upholds Illinois ban on semiautomatic weapons, overturning lower-court ruling
A federal appeals court upheld Illinois' ban on semiautomatic weapons, reversing a lower court's ruling that found the law unconstitutional. The decision supports the 2023 Protect Illinois Communities Act, enacted after a 2022 Highland Park shooting, and asserts the law aligns with firearm regulation traditions. The National Shooting Sports Foundation plans to seek Supreme Court review, while Illinois officials called the ruling a victory for public safety.
- Breaking down the Texas app store age verification law
The Supreme Court has allowed Texas to enforce a law requiring app stores to verify users' ages. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson explains the constitutional implications of the law.
- Trump fires all Election Assistance Commission members, leaving agency unable to act
President Donald Trump fired all three remaining members of the U.S. Election Assistance Commission, leaving the agency unable to function. The firings occurred amid Supreme Court rulings expanding presidential authority over independent agencies. The EAC, tasked with supporting election administration, now lacks commissioners to conduct official actions.
- South Florida’s Haitian community push for measures to protect TPS recipients during rally in Miami
South Florida’s Haitian community held a rally in Miami to advocate for legislative measures protecting Temporary Protected Status (TPS) recipients after a Supreme Court ruling allowed the Trump administration to revoke TPS for Haitians and Syrians. Rallygoers emphasized the economic impact of revoking TPS and urged support for a bipartisan Senate bill to extend protections through 2029.
- California should require mail-in ballots to arrive by Election Day
California is being urged to amend its laws to ensure mail-in ballots arrive by Election Day, despite the Supreme Court's potential refusal to mandate such a requirement.
- Florida leaders hoping for resolution as Trump administration pushes to end TPS for Haitians
Over 300,000 Haitians in the U.S. under Temporary Protected Status (TPS) may face deportation after the Trump administration's decision, supported by a Supreme Court ruling. Florida leaders and organizations, including the Florida Restaurant Association and Pastor Joanem 'FanFan' Floreal, are urging protections for affected workers critical to industries like healthcare and hospitality.
- Trump’s Supreme Court mulligan ‘exceedingly unlikely,’ experts say
President Donald Trump has requested the Supreme Court to rehear two cases: its birthright citizenship decision and a $5 million judgment against him in a lawsuit with E. Jean Carroll. Legal experts say such rehearing requests are exceptionally rare, with little chance of success, particularly for the birthright citizenship case decided on merits.
- A Supreme Court climate case meets a changing scientific consensus
The Supreme Court is set to rule on Suncor Energy v. Boulder County, a climate litigation case seeking to hold energy producers financially accountable for climate change consequences. The case is criticized for relying on outdated scientific assumptions that are no longer valid.
- Trump can halt trade with Spain using law behind scrapped tariffs: Greer
Trump claimed IEEPA allowed him to impose tariffs on most countries, but the Supreme Court invalidated those tariffs. The article notes Trump could still use the same law to halt trade with Spain.
- Trump says he'll ask Supreme Court to rehear birthright citizenship case
Trump announced he will ask the Supreme Court to rehear a birthright citizenship case. The Court recently struck down the president’s day-one order requiring U.S.-born babies to have at least one parent with citizenship or legal status to receive automatic citizenship.
- California ponders a fundamental question: Should voting be easier or harder?
California faces debate over voter participation, with low turnout in recent elections sparking discussions about whether voting should be easier or harder. A ballot measure (Proposition 39) would require government-issued ID for in-person voting or mail-in ballots, while efforts to expand voting rights, such as allowing noncitizens to vote in school board elections, have seen mixed success.
- Trump to ask Supreme Court to rehear birthright citizenship case after 'insane decision'
President Donald Trump plans to request the Supreme Court rehear a birthright citizenship case after the court upheld the policy, which grants citizenship to children born in the U.S. regardless of parental immigration status. Trump criticized the decision as 'insane' and claimed it enables financial exploitation through border advertisements offering 'birthright citizenship' services. The court's 6-3 ruling affirmed the 14th Amendment's application to all children born on U.S. soil, and Republicans are exploring legislative efforts to address the issue.
- Gun Legislation Verdicts Are A Starting Point For Community Interaction
The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot enforce 'no-carry default' laws requiring concealed-carry permit holders to seek permission from property owners. The decision emphasizes that such laws conflict with Second Amendment protections.