U.S. Supreme Court
Tracked across 922 articles in the Nexus archive. Showing the most recent 40.
- Trump administration extends Haitians’ legal protection for 2 weeks
The Trump administration extended legal protection for Haitians for two weeks until July 24. The Department of Homeland Security announced the extension hours before the expiration of temporary protected status, which would have otherwise left hundreds of thousands of Haitians without legal status and employment. The decision follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing the administration to proceed with ending these protections.
- DHS extends permits for immigrants set to lose status when justices’ order takes effect
The U.S. Department of Homeland Security extended work authorization deadlines for immigrants from seven countries affected by disaster and violence, delaying expiration dates until July 17 and July 24. The Supreme Court ruled in June that the Trump administration could end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitian and Syrian immigrants, but lower courts had not yet aligned with this decision, maintaining deportation protections for now.
- DHS extends permits for immigrants set to lose status when justices’ order takes effect
The Department of Homeland Security extended work authorization deadlines for immigrants from seven countries affected by disaster and violence, delaying expiration dates set to align with a Supreme Court ruling that allows quicker deportations. The decision postpones the end of Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haitians until July 24 and for nationals of six other countries until July 17, as lower courts have yet to align with the high court's order.
- DHS extends permits for immigrants set to lose status when justices’ order takes effect
The Department of Homeland Security extended work authorization deadlines for immigrants from seven countries affected by disaster and violence, conflicting with federal court orders that had not yet aligned with a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowing faster deportations. The Supreme Court permitted the Trump administration to end Temporary Protected Status (TPS) for Haiti and Syria, but lower courts maintained deportation stays, leaving TPS protections in place until those courts lift them.
- 2 transgender girls drop New Hampshire lawsuit after Supreme Court ruling, personal hardships
Two transgender girls, Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, withdrew their lawsuit against New Hampshire’s law banning transgender athletes from girls’ sports following a U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding such state bans and due to personal hardships. Their lawyer stated the case highlighted the challenges faced by transgender youth, while the Supreme Court affirmed that these bans do not violate Title IX.
- Donald Trump ousts election commission members in latest push to reshape US voting process
President Donald Trump removed two Democratic members of the Election Assistance Commission, Thomas Hicks and Benjamin Hovland, and the Republican member Christy McCormick resigned. The action follows a Supreme Court ruling granting the president authority to dismiss agency board members, as the commission had resisted Trump's push to require voter citizenship documentation on registration forms.
- Donald Trump ousts election commission members in latest push to reshape US voting process
President Donald Trump removed two Democratic members of the Election Assistance Commission, which resisted his push to require voter citizenship documentation. The action follows a Supreme Court ruling expanding presidential authority over agency boards and may disrupt the commission's operations ahead of midterm elections.
- U.S. Supreme Court ruling likely means more political ads in Ohio
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign finance restrictions, leading to increased political ads in Ohio ahead of the November election. The ruling allows political parties to spend more money in coordination with candidates, affecting high-cost Senate and governor races. Experts debate the impact, with some arguing it enhances party influence and others warning it exacerbates corruption risks.
- As the country turns 250, retired judges hit the road to defend judicial independence
Retired judges are touring Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Michigan to warn that the rule of law in America is in grave danger, citing increased polarization and criticism of the judicial system. They highlight concerns about threats to judicial independence and the impact of political rhetoric, including remarks by President Donald Trump.
- As the country turns 250, retired judges hit the road to defend judicial independence
Retired judges are touring the U.S. to warn about threats to judicial independence and the rule of law amid declining public trust and political polarization. They cite concerns over attacks on the judiciary and increased threats against judges, including remarks by President Donald Trump.
- As the country turns 250, retired judges hit the road to defend judicial independence
Retired judges are touring the U.S. to warn about threats to judicial independence and the rule of law, citing increased polarization and criticism of the courts. They highlight concerns over attacks on judges and the politicization of the judiciary, with some linking these issues to statements by President Donald Trump.
- As the country turns 250, retired judges hit the road to defend judicial independence
Retired judges are touring the U.S. to warn that judicial independence is under threat, citing declining public trust in courts and political polarization. They highlight concerns over attacks on the judicial system and increased threats against judges, particularly linked to President Donald Trump's rhetoric.
- Can the US Supreme Court stay independent?
The article questions the independence of the US Supreme Court, citing Kim Wehle's assertion that increasing threats against judges are undermining the rule of law.
- Federal appeals court upholds Illinois ban on semiautomatic weapons, overturning lower-court ruling
A federal appeals court upheld Illinois's ban on semiautomatic weapons, overturning a lower court's ruling that deemed the law unconstitutional. The 2-1 decision affirmed the law's compliance with the Second Amendment, citing its alignment with firearm regulation traditions and evidence linking assault weapons to mass shooting severity. The law, enacted in 2023, prohibits AR-15 rifles, large-capacity magazines, and related attachments following a 2022 Highland Park parade shooting.
- Federal appeals court upholds Illinois assault weapons ban as Supreme Court takes up issue
A federal appeals court upheld Illinois' assault weapons ban, and the U.S. Supreme Court will review the issue. The decision by the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals maintains the state's prohibition on assault weapons.
- New Hampshire student athletes drop lawsuit over state’s transgender sports ban
Two New Hampshire transgender students, Parker Tirrell and Iris Turmelle, are dropping their lawsuit against House Bill 1205, a state law banning transgender girls from participating in girls' sports teams. The decision follows a U.S. Supreme Court ruling upholding a similar law in West Virginia, which the majority deemed reasonable for ensuring fairness and safety in sports.
- Religious schools that get public funds must follow Maine’s antidiscrimination laws, court rules
A federal court ruled that private religious schools in Maine receiving public funds must comply with state antidiscrimination laws prohibiting discrimination based on gender identity, sexual orientation, or religion. The decision upheld a lower court's denial of exemptions for Saint Dominic Academy and Bangor Christian Schools, though it requested reconsideration of provisions related to religious expression.
- Justice shopping on the emergency docket?
The article discusses refiled emergency applications to the U.S. Supreme Court, noting that 19% of the emergency docket consists of such applications. Despite being refiled with different justices after initial denial, none of the 408 refiled cases from 2000 to 2024 were granted. Justice Sonia Sotomayor receives the most refiles, raising questions about procedural choices.
- Trump wants court to rehear birthright citizenship case
President Donald Trump announced a request for the U.S. Supreme Court to rehear a case where it ruled against his executive order restricting birthright citizenship. A judge also ordered the release of $5.8 million Trump owes to E. Jean Carroll following a sexual abuse and defamation verdict, despite Trump's appeal.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M in Trump sex abuse and defamation case; Trump appeals
A federal judge ordered $5.8 million held in escrow to be paid to E. Jean Carroll after a jury found President Donald Trump sexually abused and defamed her. Trump appealed the decision, but a court denied his request to block the payment. The U.S. Supreme Court previously allowed the civil verdict to stand.
- Trump to ask US Supreme Court for new hearing on birthright citizenship
Trump plans to request a new hearing from the US Supreme Court regarding birthright citizenship. The Supreme Court previously ruled against Trump’s order to end birthright citizenship for individuals born in the US.
- Trump to ask US supreme court to reconsider birthright citizenship ruling
Donald Trump announced he will request the US Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling on birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, citing a Texas hospital's billboards advertising maternity services to Mexican expectant mothers. The billboards, which Trump described as evidence of birthright citizenship being exploited, were reported by Fox News but appear to be a limited example.
- Trump to ask US supreme court to reconsider birthright citizenship ruling
Donald Trump announced he will request the US Supreme Court to reconsider its ruling on birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, citing new evidence of Texas hospitals advertising maternity services in Mexico. The president referenced billboards mentioned in a Fox News report, though his social media post exaggerated the scope of the advertisements.
- Challenge to Arizona’s transgender school sports ban collapses as teen plaintiff withdraws
The lawsuit challenging Arizona’s transgender school sports ban is ending as the teen plaintiff, Jane Doe, withdraws from the case. The U.S. Supreme Court recently upheld state-level trans athletic bans, complicating legal efforts to overturn Arizona’s law, which prohibits trans girls from joining school sports teams consistent with their gender identity.
- Trump says he will ask US Supreme Court to rehear birthright citizenship case
US President Donald Trump announced he will request the Supreme Court to rehear a case challenging his executive order on birthright citizenship. The court previously rejected the order, citing the 14th Amendment's language on citizenship.
- State Senator Stewart Cathey announces 5th Congressional run
Republican State Senator Stewart Cathey Jr. announced his candidacy for the 5th Congressional District of Louisiana. He cited his experience as a combat veteran and state senator since 2019 as reasons for running. The new congressional map, affected by a U.S. Supreme Court ruling, now covers parts of northeast Louisiana, and multiple candidates including Michael Echols and Misti Cordell are seeking the seat.
- 'Gratuitously cruel': How trans youth became political targets – Stateside with Kai and Carter
The US Supreme Court ruled that Idaho and West Virginia can enforce bans on transgender athletes participating in girls’ and women's school sports teams. The decision is part of a broader political and legal attack on trans people, particularly trans youth, and could threaten LGBTQ+ civil liberties. Experts discuss the implications of the ruling with Kai Wright, Sam Levin, and Chase Strangio.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M in Trump sex abuse and defamation case; Trump appeals
A federal judge ruled that E. Jean Carroll can collect $5.8 million from an escrow account after a jury found President Donald Trump sexually abused and defamed her. Trump has appealed the decision, and the U.S. Supreme Court allowed the 2023 verdict to stand. Carroll also seeks $83 million in defamation compensation from a separate 2024 trial.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M in Trump sex abuse and defamation case; Trump appeals
A federal judge ordered President Donald Trump to pay E. Jean Carroll $5.8 million in a sex abuse and defamation case, which the Supreme Court allowed to stand. Trump is appealing the verdict and the $83 million defamation award from another trial, claiming the legal system is being used against him.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M after jury found Trump sexually abused and defamed her
A federal judge ordered that E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8 million after a jury found Donald Trump sexually abused her in 1996 and defamed her afterward. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal of the 2023 verdict, and Trump had already paid the funds set aside during the appeals process.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M after jury found Trump sexually abused and defamed her
A federal judge ordered E. Jean Carroll to be paid $5.8 million after a jury found President Trump sexually abused and defamed her. The payment follows a 2023 civil verdict and the U.S. Supreme Court's decision not to hear Trump's appeal, though he has continued defamatory attacks against her.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M after jury found Trump sexually abused and defamed her
A federal judge ordered E. Jean Carroll to receive $5.8 million plus interest after a 2023 jury found President Donald Trump sexually abused and defamed her. The U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal, and Trump continues to face an $83 million defamation case from a 2024 trial.
- Trump must pay $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll, judge says
A federal judge ruled that President Trump must pay $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll, including interest, after a 2023 jury found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The Supreme Court declined to hear an appeal, and Trump has resumed defamatory attacks against Carroll while appealing an additional $83 million defamation verdict.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M after jury found Trump sexually abused and defamed her
A federal judge ordered that E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8 million after a jury found Trump sexually abused her in 1996 and defamed her afterward. The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal of the 2023 civil verdict, and Trump had already set aside the money in a fund pending court approval.
- Judge orders E. Jean Carroll be paid $5.8M after jury found Trump sexually abused and defamed her
Judge Lewis A. Kaplan ordered the release of $5.8 million to E. Jean Carroll after a jury found Donald Trump sexually abused and defamed her. Trump has paid the amount, which was set aside during appeals, and faces ongoing defamation claims from Carroll.
- Asian parents ask U.S. Supreme Court to revisit 'racial balancing' in Montgomery County STEM program
Asian parents in Montgomery County are requesting the U.S. Supreme Court to review the public schools system's 'racial balancing' policy, which they claim unlawfully excludes their high-achieving children from middle school STEM programs.
- US birthright citizenship ruling eases fears among Indians
The US Supreme Court's recent ruling on birthright citizenship has eased concerns for Indian families in the United States by reducing uncertainty. The decision clarified legal implications related to citizenship for children born in the US.
- Revisiting which Supreme Court cases are actually the most important
The article proposes evaluating the importance of U.S. Supreme Court cases by analyzing the number of amicus curiae briefs filed and refining this metric by considering the citation history of filers in past court opinions. It critiques the bias of raw brief counts toward civil rights cases and suggests weighting filers' reputations based on how often the court has cited them previously.
- Breaking the Cycle: Transitional Justice in America After Trump
The Trump administration's actions, including targeted killings of suspected drug traffickers at sea, misuse of congressionally allocated funds, and manipulation of the Department of Justice, have been challenged as illegal and unconstitutional. Court decisions at multiple levels have repudiated these policies, but the administration has responded with threats and defiance, highlighting systemic governance flaws in the U.S. legal and political framework.
- ‘What do we have in common’: Traveling the 250 miles through Tennessee’s House District 9
Tennessee's new 9th Congressional District stretches from Nolensville through rural towns to Memphis International Airport, created by a Republican-led legislature to eliminate the last Democratic-held seat. The district splits Memphis across three districts, aiming to dilute Black voter influence and shift political representation.