POLITICSSCOTUSBLOG
Justices send compensation dispute over seized home back to lower court
The Supreme Court ruled that a Michigan county's tax sale price determines 'just compensation' for a homeowner, sending the case back to the 6th Circuit to assess procedural fairness. Michael Pung, executor of his nephew's estate, disputed the county's refusal to pay surplus proceeds based on a later higher sale price. The court emphasized historical precedent allowing tax-driven property seizures with surplus returns.
Mentioned
Related Signal
Adjacent reporting
- U.S. Supreme Court orders lower court to determine if Michigan county unfairly seized family’s home
- Michigan family gets Supreme Court support in foreclosure fairness bid
- Supreme Court sides with Michigan county in a tax foreclosure case
- Supreme Court sides with Michigan county in a tax foreclosure case
- Supreme Court sides with Michigan county in a tax foreclosure case
- Supreme Court sides with Michigan county in a tax foreclosure case