SECURITYGUARDIAN US
US supreme court rules geofence warrants require constitutional privacy protections
The US Supreme Court ruled that geofence warrants requiring smartphone location data must include constitutional privacy protections under the Fourth Amendment. Justice Elena Kagan authored the majority opinion, supporting critics who argue such warrants constitute an unconstitutional dragnet.
Mentioned
Related Signal
Adjacent reporting
- US supreme court hears whether smartphone location data warrants infringe users’ privacy
- The Supreme Court is about to decide how far geofence warrants can go
- Ingenious? Orwellian? Or both? Supreme Court considers constitutionality of 'geofence' warrants
- Privacy and law enforcement clash as the Supreme Court wrestles with 'geofence' warrants
- Supreme Court sends 'geofence warrant' case back to lower court
- Supreme Court justices skeptically question both sides in geofence surveillance case