D.C. attorney general's office

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented in a Supreme Court case upholding a police stop, criticizing the majority for overruling a lower court's factual determination. The 7-2 decision supported the officer's reasonable suspicion based on the 'totality of circumstances,' while Jackson argued the high court overstepped in correcting routine judicial evaluations.

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented alone in a Supreme Court case where the majority upheld a police stop under the Fourth Amendment, criticizing the Court for overstepping in correcting a lower court's factual evaluation. The 7-2 decision emphasized police officers' broad discretion to consider 'totality of circumstances' in justifying stops, while Jackson argued for judicial restraint and defended the lower court's ruling.