Michael Achterling

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, rejecting arguments from the Trump administration and Republican states. The decision, in RNC vs. Watson, upheld Mississippi's law allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five business days, with thirteen states having similar grace periods.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, rejecting arguments that federal law requires all ballots to be received by election day. The decision, in RNC vs. Watson, upheld Mississippi's law allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five business days, with thirteen states having similar grace periods. Justice Amy Coney Barrett, writing for the majority, stated federal law does not override state election rules regarding ballot deadlines.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, rejecting arguments from the Trump administration and Republican states. The decision in RNC vs. Watson upheld Mississippi's law allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five business days, a policy shared by thirteen states. The ruling emphasized federal law does not override state grace periods for mail-in ballots.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, rejecting arguments that federal law requires all ballots to be received by election day. The decision, in RNC vs. Watson, upheld Mississippi's law allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five business days, affecting 13 states with similar grace periods. The ruling was seen as a victory for Democrats and voting rights advocates, who argued strict deadlines could disenfranchise voters.