Alien Tort Statute
Coverage of Alien Tort Statute in the Nexus archive.
- Aiding and abetting impunity
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in CISCO Systems, Inc. v. Doe that corporations and government officials can no longer be sued under the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) for aiding human rights violations like torture and extrajudicial murder. The case involved allegations that CISCO provided surveillance technology to Chinese authorities, facilitating the persecution of Falun Gong practitioners, including torture and detention.
- Seeking Justice the Day After SCOTUS Killed the Alien Tort Statute
The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Cisco v. Doe I to limit the use of the 1789 Alien Tort Statute, preventing foreign human rights survivors from pursuing corporate accountability in U.S. courts. The 6-3 decision shields Cisco Systems from a lawsuit by Falun Gong members who allege the company aided Chinese government surveillance against them.
- What to know about the court’s five latest rulings
The court released five rulings, including Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization, which overturned abortion rights, and decisions in cases involving the Alien Tort Statute, Helms-Burton Act, Religious Land Use Act, tax sales compensation, and immigration law. Opinions were split in several cases, with majority and dissenting opinions authored by various justices.
- Justices slam court doors on foreign torture claims
The Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit from Chinese Falun Gong members against Cisco Systems, who alleged the company aided the Chinese Communist Party in human rights abuses through the 'Golden Shield' surveillance system. The majority ruled that U.S. courts cannot create new legal pathways for foreign nationals to address international law violations, citing separation of powers and constitutional constraints.
- Supreme Court limits ability of foreigners to bring lawsuits for violations of international law
The Supreme Court ruled that the Alien Tort Statute (ATS) and Torture Victim Protection Act (TVPA) do not allow lawsuits for aiding and abetting torture or most international law violations, limiting foreign plaintiffs' ability to seek redress in U.S. courts. The decision, led by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, emphasized statutory text and constitutional limits, while dissenting justices argued it blocks future cases. The ruling affects cases like Cisco Systems v. Doe and historical ATS cases such as Filartiga v. Pena-Irala.
- Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members
The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit against Cisco Systems, which alleged the company's technology was used to persecute Falun Gong members in China. The court ruled that U.S. courts are not the appropriate venue for such claims under the Alien Tort Statute or the Torture Victim Protection Act. Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion closed the door on using U.S. courts for foreign human rights violations, while Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissented, arguing it would block future international law cases.
- US supreme court ends lawsuit alleging Cisco helped China pursue Falun Gong
The US Supreme Court ended a lawsuit against Cisco Systems, which was accused of developing technology that enabled China to surveil and persecute Falun Gong members. The court reversed a lower court decision, limiting the scope of the 1789 Alien Tort Statute used to hold corporations accountable for foreign human rights abuses.
- Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members
The U.S. Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit against Cisco, which alleged the company's technology aided China in persecuting Falun Gong members. The ruling rejected claims under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act, stating U.S. courts are not the appropriate venue for such suits. Cisco's technology was previously linked to China's surveillance efforts, including the 'Golden Shield' internet censorship program.
- Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members
The Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit against Cisco, which alleged its technology enabled China's persecution of Falun Gong members. The court ruled U.S. courts are not the appropriate venue, rejecting claims under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act. Cisco's involvement in China's 'Golden Shield' surveillance system and its role in tracking Falun Gong material were central to the case.
- Supreme Court kills suit claiming Cisco’s technology helped China persecute Falun Gong members
The Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit against Cisco, which alleged its technology aided China's persecution of Falun Gong members. The court ruled U.S. courts are not the appropriate venue, rejecting claims under the Alien Tort Statute and Torture Victim Protection Act. Cisco disputed allegations it tailored technology for China's surveillance efforts targeting Falun Gong.