Republican National Committee
Coverage of Republican National Committee in the Nexus archive.
- North Carolina Republicans are anxious for more money to beat Roy Cooper
North Carolina Republicans are seeking increased financial support to challenge Roy Cooper in the Senate race, as Republican candidate Michael Whatley trails in polls and fundraising. Cooper, a former governor, has raised significantly more funds and holds a lead in public polling, raising concerns among GOP strategists about Whatley's visibility and campaign strategy.
- U.S. Supreme Court ruling likely means more political ads in Ohio
The U.S. Supreme Court struck down limits on campaign finance restrictions, leading to increased political ads in Ohio ahead of the November election. The ruling allows political parties to spend more money in coordination with candidates, affecting high-cost Senate and governor races. Experts debate the impact, with some arguing it enhances party influence and others warning it exacerbates corruption risks.
- Capitol agenda: Collins loses her foil in Platner
Susan Collins' re-election campaign faces uncertainty after Graham Platner withdrew from the race, forcing Democrats to select a new nominee. Collins' team had leveraged Platner's controversies to counter his challenge, but his exit complicates their strategy. Democrats plan a nominating convention, while Republicans aim to associate the new nominee with Platner's allegations.
- GOP rips Platner on the way out
Republicans criticized Graham Platner after he suspended his campaign, attempting to link Democrats to his failed candidacy. GOP figures accused Democrats of undermining Maine voters and expressed confidence in Susan Collins' re-election despite the state being won by Kamala Harris in 2024.
- Judge sets February trial for man charged with planting pipe bombs on the eve of the Capitol riot
A federal trial for Brian J. Cole Jr. is set to begin on February 16 for planting pipe bombs near the Republican and Democratic National Committee headquarters on the eve of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot. A judge ruled that President Donald Trump’s pardons for Capitol rioters do not apply to Cole, and the case will proceed despite defense arguments for a pardon.
- Judge sets February trial for man charged with planting pipe bombs on the eve of the Capitol riot
A federal trial for Brian J. Cole Jr., charged with planting pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican National Committee headquarters on the eve of the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot, is set to begin February 16. U.S. District Judge Amir Ali rejected arguments that Cole qualifies for a pardon under Trump's mass pardons for Jan. 6 rioters, ruling the pardons apply only to those convicted of Capitol-related crimes.
- Trump's pardons for Jan. 6 rioters don't apply to DC pipe bomb suspect
A federal judge ruled that President Trump's pardons for Jan. 6 rioters do not apply to Brian J. Cole Jr., a Virginia man charged with planting pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., on the night before the riot. Cole was not charged or convicted when Trump issued the pardons, and prosecutors argued the pardons only cover those convicted of or indicted for Capitol riot-related crimes.
- Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 rioters don’t apply to DC pipe bomb suspect, judge rules
A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 rioters do not apply to Brian J. Cole Jr., a Virginia man charged with planting pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C., on the night before the Capitol attack. The judge noted that Cole was not convicted of any crimes when the pardons were issued, and the pardons explicitly targeted those convicted in the Jan. 6 attack.
- Trump's pardons for Jan. 6 rioters don't apply to DC pipe bomb suspect, judge rules
A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 rioters do not apply to Brian J. Cole Jr., a Virginia man charged with planting pipe bombs near Democratic and Republican party headquarters in Washington, D.C., before the Jan. 6, 2021, riot. The judge noted that Cole was not charged or convicted when Trump issued the pardons, which explicitly applied only to those convicted of Jan. 6-related crimes.
- Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 rioters don’t apply to DC pipe bomb suspect, judge rules
A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 rioters do not apply to Brian J. Cole Jr., a Virginia man charged with planting pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican National Committee headquarters on the night before the Jan. 6, 2021, riot. The judge noted that Cole was not charged or convicted when Trump issued the pardons, which explicitly applied only to those convicted of Jan. 6-related crimes.
- Trump's pardons for Jan. 6 rioters don't apply to DC pipe bomb suspect, judge rules
A federal judge ruled that President Trump’s pardons for Jan. 6 rioters do not apply to Brian J. Cole Jr., a Virginia man charged with planting pipe bombs near the Democratic and Republican National Committee headquarters in Washington, D.C. The judge noted Cole was not charged or convicted when the pardons were issued, and the case against him will proceed.
- Senate hopeful says Texas home to the 'best drag queens in the nation' in resurfaced comments
Senate hopeful James Talarico faces backlash for past comments praising Texas drag queens as 'some of the best in the nation,' which resurfaced amid a legislative debate over a bill restricting 'sexually oriented performances' near minors. Talarico voted 'present' on the bill after LGBTQ advocacy groups urged caution, and opponents, including Republican Senate nominee Ken Paxton and the RNC, criticized his remarks as out of step with Texas values.
- Senate hopeful says Texas home to the 'best drag queens in the nation' in resurfaced comments
Senate hopeful James Talarico faced backlash after resurfaced comments praising Texas drag queens as 'some of the best in the nation.' He criticized a 2023 Texas law restricting 'sexually oriented performances' near minors and voted 'present' on the legislation, which was later signed into law but faces ongoing legal challenges. Republican opponents and the RNC condemned his remarks as out of touch with Texas values.
- Vance's hot summer positions to be Trump's heir — for now
JD Vance has positioned himself as a key political figure through a bestselling book, a role in brokering a tentative peace deal with Iran, and extensive media appearances. His rising favorability among Republicans and President Trump's endorsement highlight his potential as Trump's political heir for the 2028 election.
- Trump got the Senate candidates he wanted. How much will he spend to help them?
President Donald Trump reshaped the 2024 U.S. Senate map by endorsing loyalists over some Republican incumbents. The article highlights uncertainty about how much MAGA Inc., a major political fundraising group, will spend on key races in Texas and North Carolina, where Trump-backed candidates face challenges. MAGA Inc. holds $382 million but cannot coordinate directly with campaigns or party committees.
- Colo. GOP applauds SCOTUS ruling erasing limits on party spending coordinated with candidates
The Supreme Court struck down limits on political party spending coordinated with candidates, allowing national parties to directly contribute to campaigns. The Colorado Republican Party supports the ruling, citing it as free speech, while Republicans hold a financial advantage over Democrats.
- Republican Party to host historic midterm convention in Dallas, Trump announces on Truth Social
President Donald Trump announced on Truth Social that the Republican Party will host its first 'Midterm Convention' in Dallas, Texas, on September 9-10 to highlight policy achievements. The event, approved by the Republican National Committee, aims to showcase the administration's accomplishments ahead of the midterms, despite Trump's low approval ratings and criticism from the Democratic National Committee.
- Republican Party to host historic midterm convention in Dallas, Trump announces on Truth Social
President Donald Trump announced the Republican Party's first 'Midterm Convention' in Dallas, Texas, scheduled for September 9-10 to highlight policy achievements. The Democratic National Committee criticized the event as a 'multi-million dollar televised celebration' amid Trump's low approval ratings.
- GOP gets new midterm spending weapon from SCOTUS
A Supreme Court ruling allows GOP campaign committees to spend unlimited funds in coordination with candidates, enhancing their financial advantage over Democrats. The Senate GOP campaign committee plans to shift to coordinated ad buys under the new rules, leveraging lower ad and postage costs. Republican committees hold significantly more cash reserves compared to Democratic counterparts as of May.
- Trump announces midterm convention for Republicans in Dallas in September
President Trump announced a Republican national convention in Dallas on September 9-10, the first-ever for midterms, to boost voter turnout. The event aims to focus attention on congressional races, including a competitive Senate race in Texas between James Talarico and Ken Paxton, and follows Republican procedural changes to enable the gathering.
- Trump announces midterm convention for Republicans in Dallas in September
President Donald Trump announced a Republican national convention in Dallas on September 9 and 10 to boost midterm election turnout. The event aims to address slim Republican majorities in Congress and concerns about voter engagement without Trump on the ballot, with a focus on the Texas Senate race between James Talarico and Ken Paxton.
- Trump announces midterm convention for Republicans in Dallas in September
President Donald Trump announced a Republican national convention in Dallas on Sept. 9-10 to boost midterm election turnout, a first for the party. The event aims to focus on congressional races that could determine control of Congress, with Texas’s Senate race between Ken Paxton and James Talarico highlighted as a key contest. The Republican National Committee amended procedures in January to enable the convention, which follows Trump’s push for redistricting in Texas.
- SCOTUS shatters party-candidate spending limits for GOP
The Supreme Court struck down campaign spending limits between political parties and candidates, a challenge led by GOP figures including JD Vance and Steve Chabot. The decision impacts the Federal Election Campaign Act's donation caps, which Republicans argue violate the First Amendment. The ruling follows prior cases like Citizens United and McCutcheon that reshaped campaign finance regulations.
- Republicans sue Colorado to block votes by some overseas U.S. citizens
The Republican National Committee and two Colorado officials sued Secretary of State Jena Griswold, alleging that Colorado's policy allowing overseas U.S. citizens to register based on family residency violates the state constitution. The lawsuit targets guidance enabling voters under the Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act to register if their parent, spouse, or partner previously lived in Colorado, arguing residency cannot be established by proxy. Similar lawsuits have been filed in other states, with mixed judicial outcomes.
- US Supreme Court to take up Arizona proof of citizenship case
The U.S. Supreme Court will review Arizona's laws requiring proof of citizenship for voter registration and purging voter rolls before elections, challenged by voting rights groups. The case, originating in 2022, involves the Republican National Committee and the U.S. Department of Justice opposing a 9th Circuit Court ruling that blocked the laws, citing violations of the National Voter Registration Act and Civil Rights Act.
- Supreme Court upholds state law on late mail-in ballots
The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots postmarked on Election Day to be counted up to five days later, rejecting a Republican National Committee challenge. The 5-4 decision emphasized federal law does not require ballots to be received by Election Day, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett writing the majority opinion. The ruling impacts 30 states and Washington, D.C., ahead of the 2026 midterms.
- Supreme Court upholds state law on late mail-in ballots
The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots postmarked on Election Day to be counted up to five days after, rejecting the Republican National Committee's challenge. In a 5-4 decision, the court ruled federal law does not require votes to be received by Election Day, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett writing the majority opinion. The ruling impacts 30 states and Washington, D.C., ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
- Supreme Court upholds state law on late mail-in ballots
The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to five days after Election Day if postmarked on time, rejecting a Republican National Committee challenge. The 5-4 decision emphasized federal law does not require ballots to be received by Election Day, impacting 30 states and Washington, D.C. before the 2026 midterms. The ruling split the Court along ideological lines, with the Republican National Committee vowing to continue opposing late-counted ballots.
- Mail-in ballots will keep their grace period under new Supreme Court ruling
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Mississippi's law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted up to five days after election day if postmarked by election day. The 5-4 ruling permits similar laws in 14 states and the District of Columbia. The Republican National Committee and President Trump opposed the measure, while voting rights groups supported it.
- Supreme Court rejects GOP mail ballot challenge, but Illinois Dems warn voting rights 'still under attack'
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Republican National Committee challenge to Illinois' mail-in ballot rules, allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted even if received afterward. President Donald Trump criticized the decision as a loss and reiterated support for the SAVE America Act, which would ban most mail ballots and require proof of citizenship for voter registration. Illinois permits mail ballots to arrive up to two weeks after Election Day if postmarked on time, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett writing the majority opinion.
- Supreme Court ruling gives a reprieve to states with grace periods for receiving mail ballots
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the legality of counting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterward, preserving grace periods in 14 states. The decision rejected a Republican National Committee challenge to Mississippi's law, which allows ballots to be counted up to five days after Election Day, and spared states from last-minute changes before midterms.
- Supreme Court ruling gives a reprieve to states with grace periods for receiving mail ballots
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Republican challenge to state laws allowing mail ballots to be counted after Election Day, preserving grace periods in 14 states. The ruling upheld Mississippi’s law permitting ballots postmarked by Election Day and received up to five days later, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett affirming the practice’s legality under federal law.
- Supreme Court ruling gives a reprieve to states with grace periods for receiving mail ballots
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Republican effort to ban grace periods for mail ballots, allowing 14 states to continue counting ballots postmarked by Election Day but received afterward. The ruling upheld Mississippi's law and spared states from potential last-minute changes ahead of midterms, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett affirming the legality of the practice under federal law.
- Supreme Court ruling gives a reprieve to states with grace periods for receiving mail ballots
The U.S. Supreme Court rejected a Republican National Committee effort to ban grace periods for mail ballots, preserving the practice in 14 states. The ruling upheld Mississippi's law allowing mail ballots postmarked by Election Day and received up to five days later, with Justice Amy Coney Barrett affirming the legality of such periods under federal law.
- Supreme Court ruling gives a reprieve to states with grace periods for receiving mail ballots
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld grace periods for counting mail ballots postmarked by Election Day but received later, blocking a Republican challenge targeting Mississippi's law. Fourteen states, including California and Illinois, will retain their practices, avoiding last-minute changes before midterms. The ruling clarified that federal law does not require ballots to be received by Election Day.
- Supreme Court rules states can count late-arriving mailed ballots, rejecting Trump-led challenge
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mailed ballots arriving after Election Day if postmarked by Election Day, rejecting a Republican-led challenge. Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote the majority opinion, while Justice Samuel Alito dissented, arguing the decision risks election integrity. President Donald Trump criticized the ruling, calling it a 'tremendous loss' and urging Congress to pass the SAVE America Act.
- Supreme Court approves mail-in ballots that arrive after Election Day
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mail-in ballots postmarked by Election Day even if they arrive up to five days later. The decision rejected the Republican National Committee's challenge to Mississippi's election rules, affirming that federal law does not require ballots to be received by Election Day and allowing states to set their own receipt timelines.
- One of Trump’s Supreme Court appointees just saved the late mail ballots he hates so much
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mail ballots postmarked by Election Day even if they arrive later, rejecting a Republican-led challenge. Justice Amy Coney Barrett authored the majority opinion, while President Donald Trump criticized the decision and reiterated calls for the SAVE America Act. The ruling preserves current ballot rules ahead of the 2026 midterms.
- Supreme Court rules states can count late-arriving mailed ballots, rejecting Trump-led challenge
The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mailed ballots arriving after Election Day if postmarked by Election Day, rejecting a Republican-led challenge. Justice Amy Coney Barrett's majority opinion stated federal law does not mandate a single deadline for ballot receipt. President Donald Trump criticized the decision, calling it a 'tremendous loss' and urging Congress to pass the SAVE America Act.
- Supreme Court upholds late-arriving mail ballots in Mississippi
The Supreme Court upheld a Mississippi law allowing mail-in ballots to be counted if postmarked by Election Day and received within five business days. In a 5-4 decision, the Court ruled federal election law does not require ballots to be received by Election Day, reversing a lower court that had sided with the Republican National Committee and Mississippi Republican Party. Roughly 30 states have similar laws permitting late-arriving mail ballots.