Roberta Kaplan

E. Jean Carroll requested a judge to require President Donald Trump to pay $5.8 million from a 2023 civil verdict, which found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal, prompting Carroll's lawyers to argue against further delays in disbursement, while Trump vowed to continue legal challenges.

E. Jean Carroll requested a judge to require President Trump to pay $5.8 million from a 2023 civil jury verdict, which found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The Supreme Court refused to hear Trump's appeal, and his lawyers sought to delay payment while reconsidering the decision.

E. Jean Carroll, an advice columnist, requested a judge to compel President Donald Trump to pay $5.8 million, including interest, following a 2023 civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. Carroll's lawyers argued Trump unjustly delayed the payout and resumed defamatory attacks against her, while Trump vowed to continue fighting the case. The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal.

E. Jean Carroll seeks $5.8 million from Donald Trump after the Supreme Court denied his appeal of a 2003 civil jury verdict, which found Trump sexually abused and defamed her. Carroll's lawyers argue Trump's attempts to delay payment are unjust, while Trump vows to continue fighting the case.

E. Jean Carroll, an advice columnist, requested a judge to compel President Donald Trump to pay $5.8 million following a 2023 civil jury verdict that found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. The Supreme Court declined to hear Trump's appeal, and Carroll's lawyers argued there is no justification to delay the payout, which includes interest. Trump is also appealing an $83 million defamation verdict from a separate trial.

The US Supreme Court granted Donald Trump and future presidents the power to fire leaders of independent agencies, overturning a 90-year precedent. The court also ruled against Trump's administration on mail-in ballots, allowing them to be counted after election day, and mandated privacy protections for smartphone location data. Additionally, the court affirmed a jury's verdict against Trump in a case involving E. Jean Carroll.

The US Supreme Court ruled that presidents can fire agency leaders without cause, overturning 90 years of precedent, but also decided against allowing mail-in ballots arriving after election day to be counted. The court also required privacy protections for law enforcement use of smartphone location data.

The Supreme Court declined to review President Donald Trump's request to overturn a $5 million verdict in a sexual abuse case involving E. Jean Carroll. The court's decision upholds a jury's finding that Trump sexually abused Carroll in the mid-1990s and later defamed her.

The Supreme Court declined to review President Donald Trump's request to overturn a $5 million verdict against him in a case where a jury found him liable for sexually abusing E. Jean Carroll and defaming her. Trump's lawyers argued evidentiary rulings favored the plaintiff, while Carroll's attorneys asserted the case was not worthy of review. The decision allows the verdict to stand.

The Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn a $5 million verdict in a case where E. Jean Carroll alleged he sexually abused her in the mid-1990s and later defamed her. Trump’s lawyers argued evidentiary rulings, including testimony from two other women, improperly supported the verdict, but the court declined to review the case.

The Supreme Court declined to review President Donald Trump's appeal to overturn a $5 million verdict in E. Jean Carroll's sexual abuse and defamation case. Trump's lawyers argued evidentiary rulings and judicial decisions were flawed, while Carroll's attorneys asserted the case was properly handled under existing legal standards.

The Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump's attempt to overturn a $5 million verdict against him in a case where a jury found he sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll in the 1990s and later defamed her. Trump's lawyers argued evidentiary issues, including testimony from other accusers, but the court declined to take the case.

The Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to overturn a $5 million verdict in E. Jean Carroll’s case, which found him liable for sexual abuse and defamation. Trump’s lawyers argued the verdict was based on inflammatory evidence and flawed judicial rulings, but the court declined to review the case.

The Supreme Court declined to review President Donald Trump's request to overturn a $5 million verdict against him in a sexual abuse case involving E. Jean Carroll. Trump's lawyers argued evidentiary rulings, including testimony from other accusers, improperly supported the verdict, while Carroll's attorneys maintained the case was not worthy of review. The court's decision upholds the jury's finding that Trump sexually abused Carroll in the 1990s and later defamed her.